Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai City-15 v. M/S Bhawanji Bipinchan...

Mumbai City-15 v. M/S Bhawanji Bipinchandra

High Court 20 Nov 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-15 v. M/S Bhawanji Bipinchandra
Date of order
20 Nov 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai City-15 v. M/S Bhawanji Bipinchandra, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1353 OF 2003 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 372 OF 2003 Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai City-15 .. Appellant V/s M/s Bhawanji Bipinchandra .. Respondent Mr.R.K. Sharma for the Appellant. Ms. Aasifa Khan i/b Jyoti Dialani for the Respondent. CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 20TH NOVEMBER 2006 P.C. P.C. : P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Sharma in support of this motion. Ms.Khan appears for the Respondent. 2. Motion seeks condonation of delay of 61 days in filing the appeal. The explanation is given in the supporting affidavit stating that the department was undergoing restructuring. The application is opposed by filing a reply. Even so, with a view not to cause any prejudice and considering that such delay is often caused when there is a restructuring of the department, we grant this motion. Delay is condoned. Appeal be numbered. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan