Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai City-15 v. M/S Bhawanji Bipinchan...

Mumbai City-15 v. M/S Bhawanji Bipinchandra

High Court 20 Nov 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-15 v. M/S Bhawanji Bipinchandra
Date of order
20 Nov 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai City-15 v. M/S Bhawanji Bipinchandra, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 372 OF 2003 Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai City-15 .. Appellant V/s M/s Bhawanji Bipinchandra .. Respondent Mr.R.K. Sharma for the Appellant. Ms. Aasifa Khan i/b Jyoti Dialani for the Respondent. CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 20TH NOVEMBER 2006 P.C. P.C. : P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Sharma in support of this Appeal. Ms.Khan appears for the Respondent. 2. The disputed claim in this appeal is just over Rs.1 lakh. The question of law sought to be raised is with respect to the business loss which is sought to be claimed as deduction and which has been allowed in favour of the assessee. This is not a question which requires to be gone into, particularly when the tax effect is less than Rs.4 lakhs. No reason to entertain this appeal in view of the circular issued by the department. Appeal is dismissed. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan