In Mumbai City-15 v. M/S Bhawanji Bipinchandra, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 372 OF 2003
Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai City-15 .. Appellant
V/s
M/s Bhawanji Bipinchandra .. Respondent
Mr.R.K. Sharma for the Appellant.
Ms. Aasifa Khan i/b Jyoti Dialani for the Respondent.
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 20TH NOVEMBER 2006
P.C.
P.C. :
P.C.
1. Heard Mr.Sharma in support of this Appeal.
Ms.Khan appears for the Respondent.
2. The disputed claim in this appeal is just over
Rs.1 lakh. The question of law sought to be raised is
with respect to the business loss which is sought to be
claimed as deduction and which has been allowed in
favour of the assessee. This is not a question which
requires to be gone into, particularly when the tax
effect is less than Rs.4 lakhs. No reason to entertain
this appeal in view of the circular issued by the
department. Appeal is dismissed.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.