Mumbai City 16, Mumbai v. M/S.numex Engineers
High Court
25 Jun 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City 16, Mumbai v. M/S.numex Engineers
Date of order
25 Jun 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City 16, Mumbai v. M/S.numex Engineers, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly the appeal and the notice of motion stand disposed of as withdrawn. - 2 - 2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.1371 OF 2004
AND
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3796 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.1371 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-Tax,
Mumbai City 16, Mumbai. .. Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Numex Engineers. .. Respondent
--
Shri A.Ashokan for the Appellant.
Ms Aasifa Khan for the Respondent.
--
CORAM : SRI R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR &
SRI P.B.MAJMUDAR, JJ
DATED : 25TH JUNE, 2008
P.C.
1. The learned advcoate for the appellant states
that the tax effect is less than Rs.4,00,000/- (Four
Lakhs) and therefore, he craves leave to withdraw the
appeal and the notice of motion. Accordingly the
appeal and the notice of motion stand disposed of as
withdrawn.
- 2 -
2. Needless to say that the appellant would be entitled for refund of court fee in accordance with
the provisions of law.
( R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR, J )
( P.B.MAJMUDAR, J )
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue