Mumbai City 18, Mumbai v. Shri.kailash Prasad S.malpani
High Court
17 Jun 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City 18, Mumbai v. Shri.kailash Prasad S.malpani
Date of order
17 Jun 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Mumbai City 18, Mumbai v. Shri.kailash Prasad S.malpani, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2514 OF 2002
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2514 OF 2002
ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.297 OF 2002
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.297 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai City 18, Mumbai .. Appellant
V/s
Shri.Kailash Prasad S.Malpani .. Respondent
Mr.A.S.Rao for the Appellant.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
A.S.AGUIAR, JJ.
A.S.AGUIAR, JJ.
DATE : 17.06.2005.
DATE : 17.06.2005.
DATE : 17.06.2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Inspite of several opportunities, there is no proper
affidavit of service filed by the Appellant. The
Respondents are not appearing. Hence, Notice of Motion
stands dismissed.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(A.S.AGUIAR,J.)
(A.S.AGUIAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue