Mumbai City-18 v. Dhanraj M. Rajpal

(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1606 OF 2004 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.720 OF 2004 Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai City-18 ...............Appellant Vs. Dhanraj M. Rajpal ..Respondent Mr.R.G. Bhat i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant. Ms.Aasifa Khan, for respondent. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 17TH JULY,2007 CORAM: F.I. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 17TH JULY,2007 P.C.: P.C.: . We have perused the affidavit in support of the Motion as also the additional affidavit in support of the motion. 2. We have also considered the affidavits filed opposing condonation of delay. 3. Considering the details as set out in para.4 of additional affidavit and the administrative delays which has been occasioned in the Ministry of Law in our opinion the cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. On the facts of this case delay condoned. Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the Appeal. (-2-) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)