In Mumbai City 22, Vashi, Navi Mumbai v. M/S. Hormuz Salt Works, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.
Issue: Admitted on the following substantial question of law: a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Honible Tribunal was justified in excluding the ex-gratia amount received and Rs.15,000/- per acre under agreement with CIDCO apart from compensation received from the...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
MSS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME-TAX APPEAL NO. 709 OF 2007
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 22
MUMBAI CITY 22, VASHI, NAVI MUMBAI - APPELLANT
Vs.
M/s. HORMUZ SALT WORKS .. RESPONDENT
Mr. N. A. Kazi for Appellant
Mr. F. V. Irani i/b Maneksha & Sethna for
respondent
CORAM:SMT.RANJANA DESAI &
J. P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE: 9/2/2009
P.C.
. Admitted on the following substantial question
of law:
a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of
the case and in law, the Honible Tribunal was
justified in excluding the ex-gratia amount
received and Rs.15,000/- per acre under agreement
with CIDCO apart from compensation received from
the State Govt. constituted compensation
compulsory acquisition of land and whether the same
is assessable to tax in the hands of the assessee?
JUDGE
2
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.