Mumbai City 26, Mumbai v. Mr. Robert Gibson
High Court
11 Dec 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City 26, Mumbai v. Mr. Robert Gibson
Date of order
11 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City 26, Mumbai v. Mr. Robert Gibson, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Notice of Motion No.4467 of 2007 in
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Notice of Motion No.4467 of 2007
in
Income Tax Appeal(L) No.2756 of 2007.
Income Tax Appeal(L) No.2756 of 2007.
Income Tax Appeal(L) No.2756 of 2007.
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Mumbai City 26, Mumbai ..Appellant
versus
Mr. Robert Gibson ..Respondent.
Mr.R. Ashokan for the Appellant
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite, JJ.
R.S.Mohite, JJ.
Dated : 11th Dec., 2007
Dated : 11th Dec., 2007
Dated : 11th Dec., 2007
P.C.
. The learned Counsel for the Revenue shows us
the record showing service on respondent. None
present. Delay is only of 24 days. Considering the
cause shown, and the averments in the application
are unrebutted, delay condoned.
. Office to register the appeal.
(F.I.Rebello, J.)
(F.I.Rebello, J.)
(F.I.Rebello, J.)
(R.S.Mohite, J.)
(R.S.Mohite, J.)
-2-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue