Mumbai City-I v. M/S. Kec International Limited
High Court
11 Dec 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-I v. M/S. Kec International Limited
Date of order
11 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City-I v. M/S. Kec International Limited, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: Consequently appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Income Tax Appeal No.104 of 2001.
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Mumbai City-I ..Appellant
versus
M/s. KEC International Limited ..Respondent.
Mr.S.M.Shah with Sandeep Wasnik & Mr.P.S.Sahadevan
for the Appellant
Mr.P.j.Pardiwala with Mr. Ligesh V. Boomer &
Shounak Satpute & Co.
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
Coram : F.I.Rebello &
R.S.Mohite, JJ.
R.S.Mohite, JJ.
Dated : 11th Dec., 2007
Dated : 11th Dec., 2007
P.C.
1. The Revenue has preferred this appeal on
questions as formulated in para 4 of the appeal
memo. In so far as question 1 and 2 in para 4 the
matter had been remitted to the Assessment Officer,
who has recorded finding that addition of
Rs.52,67,648/- is deleted. Questions 1 and 2 as
framed, therefore would not arise. In so far a
question 3 is cocnerned, the Commissioner (Appeals)
had disallowed 50% in appeal on the facts on record.
The learned tribunal held that no part of the
expenditure incurred by the assessee on presentation
articles to be treated as entertainment expenditure.
This is purely a finding of fact, and as such the
-2-
question of law as framed would not arise.
Consequently appeal is disposed of.
(F.I.Rebello, J.)
(F.I.Rebello, J.)
(F.I.Rebello, J.)
(R.S.Mohite, J.)
(R.S.Mohite, J.)
(R.S.Mohite, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.