Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai City-Ii v. Plasticotes Investment...

Mumbai City-Ii v. Plasticotes Investments Pvt.ltd

High Court 20 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-Ii v. Plasticotes Investments Pvt.ltd
Date of order
20 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai City-Ii v. Plasticotes Investments Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2462 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2462 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2462 OF 2003 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.787 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income Tax Mumbai City-II .. Appellant V/s Plasticotes Investments Pvt.Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan i/by Mr.T.C.Kaushik for the Appellant. Mr.Pankaj R.Toprani for the Respondent. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 20th March, 2007. P.C.: P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Perused the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay caused in filing the Appeal. There is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the Appellant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). 2. Place the Appeal on board for admission on 16.04.2007. 3. The learned Counsel for the Appellant undertakes to serve the copy of the Memo of appeal on the Respondent and file an acknowledgement thereof in the office within a period of one week from today.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan