Mumbai City-Ii v. The Tata Power Co. Ltd
High Court
29 Jan 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-Ii v. The Tata Power Co. Ltd
Date of order
29 Jan 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City-Ii v. The Tata Power Co. Ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL, CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.50 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai City-II. ...Appellant
Vs.
The Tata Power Co. Ltd. ...Respondent
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant
Mr.P.C.Tripati with Mr. Dinesh Vyas for the
Respondent
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S.MOHITE,JJ.DATED: 29TH JANUARY,2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S.MOHITE,JJ.
DATED: 29TH JANUARY,2008
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The questions of law which arise in this
Appeal are same as arose in Income Tax Appeal No.43
of 2001. For the same reasons as set out therein in
so far as question No.1 is concerned except the
bonus part the question is answered in favour of the
Revenue.
2. In so far as the question No.2 is concerned, for the reasons given while disposing of Income Tax Appeal No.43 of 2001 this question will not arise.
3. In the light of that Appeal allowed in so
far as question No.1 is concerned except bonus part.
In so far as question No.2 is concerned Appeal
dismissed.
(-2-)
4. The question of bonus is, therefore, kept
open for consideration in appropriate case.
J.)
(F.I.REBELLO,J.)
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO,
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
J.)
(F.I.REBELLO,
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.