Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S.i.g.e.(In...

Mumbai City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S.i.g.e.(India) Ltd

High Court 05 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S.i.g.e.(India) Ltd
Date of order
05 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai City-Iii, Mumbai v. M/S.i.g.e.(India) Ltd, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2014 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2014 OF 2003 NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2014 OF 2003 IN IN IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.649 OF 2003 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.649 OF 2003 INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.649 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai City-III, Mumbai .. Appellant V/s M/s.I.G.E.(India) Ltd. .. Respondent Mr.Sahadevan for the Appellant. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 5th March, 2007. DATE : 5th March, 2007. DATE : 5th March, 2007. P.C.: 1. The learned Counsel for the Appellant seeks leave to withdraw the Notice of Motion since the issues involved in the Appeal are squarely covered by the judgments of this Court as well as the Supreme Court. Hence, Notice of Motion is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such. (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan