Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai City - Iii, Mumbai v. M/S.sandoz...

Mumbai City - Iii, Mumbai v. M/S.sandoz Textiles

High Court 28 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City - Iii, Mumbai v. M/S.sandoz Textiles
Date of order
28 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai City - Iii, Mumbai v. M/S.sandoz Textiles, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
AGK 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.754 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income Tax Mumbai City - III, Mumbai .. Appellant. Versus M/s.Sandoz Textiles .. Respondent. Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the appellant. Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr.Raj Darak for the respondent. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 28TH AUGUST, 2007. P.C. : 1. Place this matter on board along with Income Tax Appeal Nos.421 of 2003 and 633 of 2003. 2. Revenue to serve the Respondents. 3. Stand over for two weeks. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan