Mumbai City Iv, Mumbai v. M/S.s.k.kotecha & Co
High Court
17 Jun 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City Iv, Mumbai v. M/S.s.k.kotecha & Co
Date of order
17 Jun 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City Iv, Mumbai v. M/S.s.k.kotecha & Co, the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3460 OF 2000
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3460 OF 2000
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.459 OF 2000
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.459 OF 2000
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai City IV, Mumbai .. Appellant
V/s
M/s.S.K.Kotecha & Co. .. Respondent
Mr.A.S.Rao for the Appellant.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
A.S.AGUIAR, JJ.
A.S.AGUIAR, JJ.
DATE : 17.06.2005.
DATE : 17.06.2005.
DATE : 17.06.2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Inspite of several opportunities, there is no proper
affidavit of service filed by the Appellant. The
Respondents are not appearing. Hence, Notice of Motion
stands dismissed.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(A.S.AGUIAR,J.)
(A.S.AGUIAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue