Mumbai City-Iv v. M/S.bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt.ltd
High Court
17 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-Iv v. M/S.bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt.ltd
Date of order
17 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City-Iv v. M/S.bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2535 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1016 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai City-IV....................Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Bhilosa Tex-N-Twist Pvt.Ltd.. Respondent
Mr.R.G. Bhat i/b.Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant.
Mr. Atul K. Jasani, for the Respondents.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. There is a delay of 23 days, In our opinion the cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. In the light of that Motion made absolute in terms of
cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. In the light of that Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the Appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue