Mumbai City-V, Mumbai v. M/S.disgustibus Hotels Pvt.ltd
High Court
14 Jan 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-V, Mumbai v. M/S.disgustibus Hotels Pvt.ltd
Date of order
14 Jan 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City-V, Mumbai v. M/S.disgustibus Hotels Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3818 OF 2008IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 3021 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai City-V, Mumbai.... Appellantv/sM/s.Disgustibus Hotels Pvt.Ltd.,32, Suleman Chamber, 4 Battery Street,Appollo Bunder, Mumbai - 400 021.... Respondent
Mr.R. Asokan for the appellant.Ms.Aasifa Khan for the respondent.
CORAM:F.I.REBELLO ANDR.S.MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: 14TH JANUARY, 2009
P.C.:
1. This is a notice of motion for condonation of 17days’ delay in filing the main appeal. For the reasonswhich are mentioned in the affidavit in support of thenotice of motion, the cause shown is found to besufficient cause and, therefore, delay in filing theappeal is condoned.
2. Office to number the appeal and list the same foradmission in due course. Notice of motion standsdisposed of.
(R.S.MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue