Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai City-Vii, Mumbai v. M/S.samir Dia...

Mumbai City-Vii, Mumbai v. M/S.samir Diamonds, 9/10 Prasad

High Court 18 Dec 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-Vii, Mumbai v. M/S.samir Diamonds, 9/10 Prasad
Date of order
18 Dec 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai City-Vii, Mumbai v. M/S.samir Diamonds, 9/10 Prasad, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.337 OF 2001 The Commissioner of Income Tax ) Mumbai City-VII, Mumbai )..Appellant Versus M/s.Samir Diamonds, 9/10 Prasad ) Chambers, Opera House, Mumbai400 004)..Respondents ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the appellant. Ms.V.B.Patel for respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 18.12.2007. PC 1. Revenue points out that income tax application was pending. On behalf of assessee, learned Counsel draws our attention to the order passed in Income Tax Application No.429 of 1999 on 4.7.2005. In view of the order passed in I.T.A.No.9467/B/91 in TheCommissioner of Income Tax-II V. Samir Diamonds on 22.7.2004, income tax application was dismissed. 2. On behalf of the revenue learned Counsel fairly concedes that question of law as framed considering dismissal of application would not arise. Considering the above, in our opinion, the question of law as framed would not arise and consequently, appeal dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan