Mumbai City-Viii v. Maharashtra Distilleries Ltd.worli
High Court
20 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-Viii v. Maharashtra Distilleries Ltd.worli
Date of order
20 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City-Viii v. Maharashtra Distilleries Ltd.worli, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2477 OF 2003
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2477 OF 2003
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2477 OF 2003
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.798 OF 2003
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.798 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai City-VIII .. Appellant
V/s
Maharashtra Distilleries Ltd.Worli .. Respondent
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the Appellant.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN&
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 20th March, 2007.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Appellant. None
appears for the Respondent though served. Perused the
affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. For the
reasons stated therein, sufficient cause is made out for
condonation of delay caused in filing the Appeal. There
is no case of inaction, negligence or want of bonafide
on the part of the Appellant. Hence, Notice of Motion
is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Place the Appeal on board for admission on
23.04.2007.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.