Mumbai City-Viii v. M/S.skypark Couriers (P)Ltd
High Court
17 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-Viii v. M/S.skypark Couriers (P)Ltd
Date of order
17 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City-Viii v. M/S.skypark Couriers (P)Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2410 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.977 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai City-VIII.....................Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Skypark Couriers (P)Ltd........Respondent
Mr. Ashok Kotangale i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the
Appellant.
Ms.Vasanti B. Patel for Respondent
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. There is
a delay of 22 days. Considering the cause shown in
our opinion the same would amount to sufficient
cause. In the light of that Motion made absolute in
terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the
Appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue