Mumbai City-X v. M/S.batliboi Environment Engg.ltd
High Court
17 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-X v. M/S.batliboi Environment Engg.ltd
Date of order
17 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City-X v. M/S.batliboi Environment Engg.ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2444 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.975 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai City-X.....................Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Batliboi Environment Engg.Ltd..Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta i/b.Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant
Ms. Duhita Lewis i/b. Hariani & Co., for respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
CORAM: F.I.
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Appearance put up on behalf of the parties. We
have perused the affidavit in support of the Motion.
The cause shown would amount to sufficient cause.
In the light of that Motion made absolute in terms
of prayer clause (a). Motion disposed of
accordingly. Office to register the Appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue