Mumbai City-X v. M/S.interlink Reinsurance Consultant
High Court
17 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City-X v. M/S.interlink Reinsurance Consultant
Date of order
17 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City-X v. M/S.interlink Reinsurance Consultant, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2411 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING)NO.973 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai City-X.......................Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Interlink Reinsurance Consultant
Pvt. Ltd...........................Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta i/b.Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant
Ms. P.K. Pardia for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Considering that the tax effect is less than Rs.4.00 lakhs on instructions learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Motion as also the Appeal. Motion and Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court Fees as per Rules. Certified copy expedited.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue