In Mumbai City-Xii v. M/S Jolly Maker-I Premises Co-Op, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Consequently, the appeal will also stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1380 OF 2003
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 386 OF 2003
Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai City-XII .. Appellant
V/s
M/s Jolly Maker-I Premises Co-op.
Housing Society Ltd. .. Respondents
Mr.A.S. Rao for the Appellant.
None for the Respondents.
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 20TH NOVEMBER 2006
P.C.
P.C. :
1. Heard Mr.Rao in support of this motion. None
appears for the Respondent.
2. Motion seeks condonation of delay of 359 days in
filing the appeal. The ground given in the supporting
affidavit is restructuring of the department. We accept
such explanation quite often. However, 259 days is not
a delay which for any reason could be explained on any
such ground. Motion is rejected. Consequently, the
appeal will also stand dismissed.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue