In Mumbai City - Xii v. M/S.i. Ahmed & Co, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.335 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income-tax,
Mumbai City - XII .. Appellant.
Versus
M/s.I. Ahmed & Co. .. Respondent.
Mr.A.S. Rao i/by Mr.L.S. Shetty for the appellant.
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE, &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 19TH SEPTEMBER, 2006.
P.C. :
1. The appeal is taken up for admission
forthwith. Heard Mr.Rao for the appellant.
2. The issue sought to be raised in this appeal
is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case
of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. Pravin M. Mehta
reported in 246 ITR 445 against the revenue.
3. In this view of the matter, the appeal is
dismissed with no order as to costs.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue