Mumbai City Xiii v. M/S.ramkumar Jalan
High Court
20 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City Xiii v. M/S.ramkumar Jalan
Date of order
20 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City Xiii v. M/S.ramkumar Jalan, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Till date the Revenue has not taken any steps to get the said order set aside.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2001
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.22 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Mumbai City XIII. .. Petitioner
V/s
M/s.Ramkumar Jalan .. Respondent
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2001
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Mumbai City XIII. .. Petitioner
V/s
M/s.Ramkumar Jalan .. Respondent
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.37 OF 2001
INCOME TAX APPLICATION NO.37 OF 2001
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Mumbai City XIII. .. Petitioner
V/s
M/s.Ramkumar Jalan .. Respondent
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the Petitioner.
Ms.V.B.Patel for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN&
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. All the aforesaid three Applications arise out of
the common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate
Tribunal for the Assessment Years 1976-1977 to
1981-1982. It appears that with regard to the some
Assessment Years the Revenue had filed Income Tax
Applications which have already been dismissed for want
of removal of office objections as far back as on 2nd
March, 2004. Till date the Revenue has not taken any
steps to get the said order set aside. The Revenue
seems to have accepted the said order. In view thereof,
all the above three applications stand dismissed.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.