Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai City Xvi, Mumbai v. J.p. Devadhar...

Mumbai City Xvi, Mumbai v. J.p. Devadhar, Jj

High Court 07 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City Xvi, Mumbai v. J.p. Devadhar, Jj
Date of order
07 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai City Xvi, Mumbai v. J.p. Devadhar, Jj, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Hence, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICITON INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1511 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Income-tax, Mumbai City XVI, Mumbai .. Appellant. Versus Smt.Sakina F. Sulemanjee .. Respondent. Mr.Ashok Kotangale for the appellant. CORAM : F.I. REBELLO & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 7TH AUGUST, 2007. P.C. : 1. In view of the judgment of this Court in the case of C.I.T. V/s. J.K. Investors (Bombay) Limited reported in 248 I.T.R. 723, the question of law as framed would not arise. 2. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan