Mumbai City Xvi, Mumbai v. M/S.ratnam, Mumbai
High Court
20 Mar 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City Xvi, Mumbai v. M/S.ratnam, Mumbai
Date of order
20 Mar 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City Xvi, Mumbai v. M/S.ratnam, Mumbai, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1434 OF 2003
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.403 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax
Mumbai City XVI, Mumbai .. Appellant
V/s
M/s.Ratnam, Mumbai .. Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.A.K.Jasani for the Respondent.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 20th March, 2007.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. By our
order dated 12.3.2007 as a last chance one week’s time
was granted to serve the Respondents. Inspite of
several adjournments the Respondents have not bothered
to serve the copy of the Notice of Motion and the
affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. In view
of non-service, the aforesaid Notice of Motion stands
dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue