Mumbai City=Ix v. Patel Roadways Ltd
High Court
17 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai City=Ix v. Patel Roadways Ltd
Date of order
17 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai City=Ix v. Patel Roadways Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2360 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.961 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai City=IX.....................Appellant
Vs.
Patel Roadways Ltd. ................Respondent
Mr. Ashok Kotangale i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the
Appellant.
Ms. Usha Dalal i/b. P.R. Toprani, for respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. There is a delay of 85 days. There is an
affidavit in support of the Motion.The Motion is
opposed by the respondents. In our opinion the
cause shown would amount to sufficient cause. In
the light of that Motion made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a). Office to register the Appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue