Mumbai. Disputants v. Ghanshyam Surekha & Anr. Opponents
High Court
10 Apr 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai. Disputants v. Ghanshyam Surekha & Anr. Opponents
Date of order
10 Apr 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai. Disputants v. Ghanshyam Surekha & Anr. Opponents, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
((-1-))
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.234 OF 2005
IN
EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.384 OF 2000
IN
CASE NO.CC-IV/136 OF 2000
Manavsthal II co-operative Housing
Society Ltd; Goregaon (E),
Mumbai. Disputants
versus
Ghanshyam Surekha & anr. Opponents
and
Union of India (Income Tax Dept.) Applicant
None present.
CORAM : S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.
DATE : 10th April 2006
PC :
1. The applicant is the Union of India through
Income Tax Department. This Court has passed
conditional order on 26th July 2005. Thereafter,
it appears that the Chamber Summons was
dismissed. It appears that an application
seeking restoration has not been made.
((-2-))
2. Considering these developments and further
nobody appearing for the applicant even today,
nor when this matter was placed before me on 13th
March 2006, Chamber Summons stands dismissed. No
order as to costs.
(S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue