Case Law › High Court › Mumbai v. Banwarilal Maheshwari

Mumbai v. Banwarilal Maheshwari

High Court 11 Apr 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

11 Apr 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. Banwarilal Maheshwari, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

- Chitra Sonawane IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.648/2020 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-33, Mumbai..Appellant. Vs.Banwarilal Maheshwari ....... Respondent. Mr.Sham Walve for appellant.Mr.Jitendra Singh for Respondent. P.C. CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM & N.R. BORKAR, J.J.DATED : 11 APRIL, 2022. 1.Wrongly on board as part of the group. Not to be included in thegroup.group. (N.R. BORKAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Digitally signedby CHITRACHITRASANJAYSANJAYSONAWANESONAWANEDate:2022.04.1219:11:17 +0530

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.