Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai v. Dilipkumar V. Lakhi

Mumbai v. Dilipkumar V. Lakhi

High Court 04 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Dilipkumar V. Lakhi
Date of order
04 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. Dilipkumar V. Lakhi, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4267 of 2006 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2540 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai ..Appellant Vs. Dilipkumar V. Lakhi ..Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant Ms. Saroj K. Shinde with K.S. Kumthekar, for the Respondent CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007 J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: . The delay is of 510 day. There is an affidavit in support of the motion. The order of ITAT was received by the Department on 11th April, 2005. The Scrutiny of the papers was done on 13th July, 2005. Approval was granted for filing the Appeal on 11th July, 2005. There is no explanation for the delay between 11th July, 2005 and 30th November, 2006. In our opinion even considering the cause shown the same would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion dismissed. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan