Mumbai v. Dilipkumar V. Lakhi
High Court
04 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Dilipkumar V. Lakhi
Date of order
04 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. Dilipkumar V. Lakhi, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.4267 of 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.2540 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai ..Appellant
Vs.
Dilipkumar V. Lakhi ..Respondent
Mr.P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant
Ms. Saroj K. Shinde with K.S. Kumthekar, for
the Respondent
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The delay is of 510 day. There is an
affidavit in support of the motion. The order of
ITAT was received by the Department on 11th April,
2005. The Scrutiny of the papers was done on 13th
July, 2005. Approval was granted for filing the
Appeal on 11th July, 2005. There is no explanation
for the delay between 11th July, 2005 and 30th
November, 2006. In our opinion even considering the
cause shown the same would not amount to sufficient
cause. Hence Motion dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.