Mumbai v. Director Of Income-Tax & Anr
High Court
10 Dec 2008 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Director Of Income-Tax & Anr
Date of order
10 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. Director Of Income-Tax & Anr, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty as prayed and the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
VPH
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL No. 189 OF 2008
Hindalco Industries Ltd. Appellant
Mumbai.
Vs
Director of Income-Tax & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr. P. R. Toprani, for the appellant.
Mr. Parag Vyas, for the respondent.
CORAM: Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, &
V. C. DAGA, JJ.
DATED: DECEMBER 10, 2008.
P.C.:
----
. The learned counsel for the appellant seeks
leave to withdraw the the appeal, with liberty to
approach before the Tribunal for appropriate relief.
Accordingly, the Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn,
with liberty as prayed and the Appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
Sd/- Sd/-
[ V.C. DAGA, J.] [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue