In Mumbai v. Gopal Purohit, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1012 OF 2011
The Commissioner of Income Tax-25,
Mumbai.
..Appellant.
Vs.
Gopal Purohit.
..Respondent.
....
Ms. Suchitra Kamble, for the Appellant.
Mr. S.C. Tiwari a/w. Natasha Mangat, for the Respondent.
....
P.C.
CORAM : J. P. DEVADHAR &
A.R. JOSHI, JJ. th JANUARY, 2012.
DATED : 18
1.Counsel for the parties state that similar question raised in the assessee’s own case being Income Tax Appeal No.1121 of 2009 in the case of CIT Vs. Gopal Purohit has been dismissed by this Court on 6.1.2010. For the reasons stated therein, the present appeal is also dismissed.
(A. R. JOSHI, J.)
(J. P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue