Mumbai v. Hans H. Seidl
High Court
23 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Hans H. Seidl
Date of order
23 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. Hans H. Seidl, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1561 of 2006
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.774 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai ..Appellant
Vs.
HANS H. SEIDL..............Respondent
Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant
Mr. F.P.Irani with Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the
Respondent
CORAM: F.I.
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 23rd October, 2007
P.C.:
. The Tribunal considering the judgment of
this Court in M.A.E. Paes vs. Commissioner of
Income Tax, 230 ITR 60 has applied the said ratio
and has directed the A.O. to determine the
perquisite value in terms as set out in para.4.
Considering that in our opinion apart from the fact
that the cause shown in the Motion does not amount
to sufficient cause, even otherwise no question of
law would arise. Consequently Motion and Appeal
dismissed.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue