Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal...

Mumbai v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors

High Court 04 May 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors
Date of order
04 May 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence the petition stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.875 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.875 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION NO.875 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3 Mumbai .. Petitioner V/s Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors. .. Respondents Mr.Ashok Kotangale with Mr.Sahadevan for Petitioner. Mr.S.E.Dastur, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Raj Darak and Mr.Nitesh Joshi for Respondent No.2. CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, & V.C.DAGA, JJ. DATE : 4th May, 2007. DATE : 4th May, 2007. DATE : 4th May, 2007. P.C.: 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Senior Counsel for Respondent No.2. By this Petition, the Petitioner is challenging an interlocutory order of grant of stay passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 12th March, 2007 in a pending Appeal. We do not find anything erroneous or illegal in the reasoning adopted by the Tribunal while granting the stay. The reasonings adopted by the Tribunal appear to be fair and reasonable. Over and above the Circular No.530 dated 6th March, 1989 issued by the CBDT also fully supports the case of the Respondent No.2. Clause 2(ii) of the said Circular is relevant which reads as under:- "2. Having regard to the proper and efficient management of the work of collection of revenue, the Board has considered it necessary and expedient to order that on an application being filed by the assessee in this behalf, the Assessing Officer will exercise his discretion under section 220(6) of the Act (subject to such conditions as he may think fit to impose) so as to treat the assessee as not being in default in respect of the amount in dispute in the appeal in the following situations:- (i)........ (ii) the demand in dispute relates to issues that have been decided in favour of the assessee in an earlier order by an appellate authority or court in the assessee’s own case." 2. Under these circumstances, petition is totally devoid of merits. Hence the petition stands dismissed. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.) (V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan