Mumbai v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors
High Court
04 May 2007 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors
Date of order
04 May 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence the petition stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.875 OF 2007
WRIT PETITION NO.875 OF 2007
WRIT PETITION NO.875 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax-3
Mumbai .. Petitioner
V/s
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr.Ashok Kotangale with Mr.Sahadevan for Petitioner.
Mr.S.E.Dastur, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Raj Darak and
Mr.Nitesh Joshi for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, &
V.C.DAGA, JJ.
DATE : 4th May, 2007.
DATE : 4th May, 2007.
DATE : 4th May, 2007.
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the
learned Senior Counsel for Respondent No.2. By this
Petition, the Petitioner is challenging an interlocutory
order of grant of stay passed by the Income Tax
Appellate Tribunal on 12th March, 2007 in a pending
Appeal. We do not find anything erroneous or illegal in
the reasoning adopted by the Tribunal while granting the
stay. The reasonings adopted by the Tribunal appear to
be fair and reasonable. Over and above the Circular
No.530 dated 6th March, 1989 issued by the CBDT also
fully supports the case of the Respondent No.2. Clause
2(ii) of the said Circular is relevant which reads as
under:-
"2. Having regard to the proper and efficient
management of the work of collection of revenue, the
Board has considered it necessary and expedient to
order that on an application being filed by the assessee in this behalf, the Assessing Officer will exercise his discretion under section 220(6) of the Act (subject to such conditions as he may think fit to impose) so as to treat the assessee as not being
in default in respect of the amount in dispute in the appeal in the following situations:-
(i)........ (ii) the demand in dispute relates to issues that have been decided in favour of the assessee in an earlier order by an appellate authority or court in the assessee’s own case."
2. Under these circumstances, petition is totally devoid of merits. Hence the petition stands dismissed.
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.