In Mumbai v. Mr. Kevalchand C. Ranka, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3338 OF 2005
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 1436 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax .... AppellantMumbaiVs.Mr. Kevalchand C. Ranka.... RespondentMr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant.Mr. Atul K. Jasani for Respondent.
.Considering the CBDT Circular and as thetax incidence is less than Rs.4.00 lakhs, learnedcounsel seeks leave to withdraw the Motion as alsothe Appeal. Motion along with Appeal dismissed aswithdrawn. Question of law, if any, is left openfor consideration in an appropriate proceedings.
2.Refund of Court Fees as per Rules.Certified copy expedited.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue