Case Law › High Court › Mumbai v. Mr. Mukesh A. Wig

Mumbai v. Mr. Mukesh A. Wig

High Court 10 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

10 Dec 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. Mr. Mukesh A. Wig, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY VPH ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS No. 1789 OF 2008 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL No.853 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Appellant Mumbai. Vs Mr. Mukesh A. Wig ... Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the appellant. None for the respondent. CORAM: Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, & V. C. DAGA, JJ. DATED: DECEMBER 10, 2008. P.C.: ---- . The learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the Chamber Summons, with liberty to take out a fresh Chamber Summons. The Chamber Summons is allowed to be withdrawn, with liberty as prayed. The Chamber Summons is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- [ V.C. DAGA, J.] [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.