Mumbai v. Mr. Olaf Adolf D’souza
High Court
17 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Mr. Olaf Adolf D’souza
Date of order
17 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. Mr. Olaf Adolf D’souza, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1320 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1320 OF 2008
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1320 OF 2008
IN
IN
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 620 OF 2008
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 620 OF 2008
The Commissioner of Income Tax-26
Mumbai. .. Appellant.
vs.
Mr. Olaf Adolf D’souza. .. Respondent.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant.
None for Respondent.
CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM: DR. S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
SANTOSH BORA, JJ.
DATE: 17TH APRIL, 2008.
DATE: 17TH APRIL, 2008.
P.C.
. Heard the learned cousnel for the Appellant.
None present for Respondent. By this Notice of
Motioin, the Appellant is seeking condonation of 119
days delay caused in filing the Appeal. For the
reasons stated in the affidavit-in-support of the
Notice of Motion, sufficient cause is made out for
condonation of delay, and there is no case of inaction,
negligence or want of bonafide on the part of the
2
Appellant. Hence, the Notice of Motion is made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Place the Appeal on Board for admission in the
month of September, 2008, subject to numbering.
(S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
(SANTOSH BORA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue