Mumbai v. Mr. P.s. Sahadevan With Mr. A.s. Rao For The
High Court
23 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Mr. P.s. Sahadevan With Mr. A.s. Rao For The
Date of order
23 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. Mr. P.s. Sahadevan With Mr. A.s. Rao For The, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1393 of 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.740 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai ..Appellant
Vs.
Smt. Ruchira Srivastava...........Respondents
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan with Mr. A.S. Rao for the
Appellant.
Mr. Atul K. Jasani, for the Respondent
CORAM: F.I.
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 23rd October, 2007
P.C.:
. The delay is less than 200 days.
Considering the practical difficulties which the
Department was facing including referring the
matters to the Law Department, Government of India
for drafting the Appeal Memo and considering the
affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, in our
opinion, the cause shown would amount to sufficient
cause. Hence, delay condoned. The Notice of Motion
is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).
2. Office to register the Appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue