Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai v. Mr.b.m. Chatterji With Mr. P.s...

Mumbai v. Mr.b.m. Chatterji With Mr. P.s.sahadevan For

High Court 23 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Mr.b.m. Chatterji With Mr. P.s.sahadevan For
Date of order
23 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. Mr.b.m. Chatterji With Mr. P.s.sahadevan For, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1557 of 2006 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.795 OF 2006 The Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai ..Appellant Vs. Smt. Pratima H. Mehta..............Respondent Mr.B.M. Chatterji with Mr. P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant CORAM: F.I. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 23rd October, 2007 P.C.: . Though the respondents served there is no appearance. There is delay of 279 days. There is an affidavit of S.R.Veer showing cause as to why there was delay in preferring the Appeal. The tax incidence is more than Rs.20.00 lakhs. As the averments in the affidavit in support of the Motion are not contested the cause shown in our opinion amounts sufficient cause. Hence delay condoned. Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the Appeal. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan