Mumbai v. M/S Aries Stock Traders Pvt.ltd
High Court
28 Apr 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. M/S Aries Stock Traders Pvt.ltd
Date of order
28 Apr 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. M/S Aries Stock Traders Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.1214 OF 2008inINCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.774 OF 2002inINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.OF 2008The Commissioner of Income Tax 4Mumbai.. Appellant
Vs.
M/s Aries Stock Traders Pvt.Ltd Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan with Ms.P.P.Bhosale forAppellantNone for Respondent
CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan andA.V.Nirgude, JJDATED : 28th April, 2008
P.C.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant. Bythis notice of motion, the appellant is seekingcondonation of 86 days delay caused in filing theappeal. For the reasons stated in the affidavitin support of the notice of motion, sufficientcause is made out for condonation of delay andthere is no case of inaction, negligence or wantof bonafide on the part of the appellant. Hence,the notice of motion is made absolute in terms ofprayer clause (a).
2. Place the appeal on board for admission in themonth of June, 2008.
(A.V.Nirgude, J)
(Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue