In Mumbai v. M/S Conwood Agencies Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) allowed the appeal.
Decision: Hence, appeal is allowed to bewithdrawn and is dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.of 2007
in
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1437 OF 2007
The Commissioner of Income Tax-9AppellantMumbaiVs.
M/s Conwood Agencies Pvt.Ltd...Respondent
Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for AppellantMr.S.J.Mehta for Respondent
P.C.
CORAM : Dr.S.Radhakrishnan andA.V.Nirgude, JJDATE : 14th July, 2008
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant andlearned counsel for the respondent. Learnedcounsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdrawthe above appeal as the tax effect is less thanRs.4,00,000/-. Hence, appeal is allowed to bewithdrawn and is dismissed as such. PermissibleCourt fees be refunded to the appellant as perrules.
{ A.V.Nirgude, J } { Dr.S.Radhakrishnan, J }
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.