Case Law › High Court › Mumbai v. M/S. Hertz Chemicals Ltd

Mumbai v. M/S. Hertz Chemicals Ltd

High Court 03 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

03 Dec 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. M/S. Hertz Chemicals Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: 3238 of 2008, present Appeal does not survive for consideration and is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY VPH ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.2083 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax-8 Appellant Mumbai Vs M/s. Hertz Chemicals Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the appellant. Mr. S. G. Dalal, for the respondent. CORAM: Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, & V. C. DAGA, JJ. DATED: DECEMBER 3, 2008. P.C.: ---- . In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion No. 3238 of 2008, present Appeal does not survive for consideration and is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- [ V. C. DAGA, J.] [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.