In Mumbai v. M/S Indhradam Traders Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: 2) Hence, appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 739 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax .... Appellant
Mumbai
Vs.
M/s Indhradam Traders Pvt.Ltd. .... Respondent
Mumbai
Mr. Ashok Kotangale for Appellant.
Mr. J.D. Mistry with Raj Darak for Respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, &
. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ
DATE : 14TH AUGUST, 2007
P.C.
1) On behalf of the appellant, it is submitted
that the questions of law in this matter would be
covered by the judgment of this Court dated 11th
June 2007 in Income Tax Application No. 11 of 1999
in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Lazer Syntex
Limited. In our opinion therefore the questions of
law as framed will not arise.
2) Hence, appeal is dismissed.
( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue