Mumbai v. M/S Maneesha Pharmaceuticals
High Court
04 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. M/S Maneesha Pharmaceuticals
Date of order
04 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. M/S Maneesha Pharmaceuticals, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3354 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODGING) NO. 1446 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income- Tax .... AppellantMumbaiVs.M/s Maneesha Pharmaceuticals.... RespondentPvt. Ltd.
Mr. Vimal Gupte for the Appellant.
P.C.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, &J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.DATE : 4TH SEPTEMBER, 2007
.The delay is less than 200 days.Considering the practical difficulties which theDepartment was facing including referring thematters to the Law Department, Government of Indiafor drafting the Appeal Memo and considering theaffidavit in support of the Notice of Motion, inour opinion, the cause shown would amount tosufficient cause. Hence, delay condoned. TheNotice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayerclause (a).
2.Office to register the Appeal.
( J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue