Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai v. M/S Parmananddas Jivandas Hidu...

Mumbai v. M/S Parmananddas Jivandas Hidu Gymkhana

High Court 09 Aug 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. M/S Parmananddas Jivandas Hidu Gymkhana
Date of order
09 Aug 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. M/S Parmananddas Jivandas Hidu Gymkhana, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
T IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO.701 OF 2011ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 4537 OF 2010 Director of Income Tax (Exemption) Mumbai...Appellant. Vs.M/s Parmananddas Jivandas Hidu Gymkhana...Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Appellant. Mr.D.Damodar i/b Kanga & Co., for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR ANDA.A. SAYED, JJ.DATE : 9[th] AUGUST, 2011. P.C. By consent, the Notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayers clause (a) and (b). ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan