Case Law › High Court › Mumbai v. M/S. Rainbow Mercantile P. Ltd

Mumbai v. M/S. Rainbow Mercantile P. Ltd

High Court 10 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

10 Dec 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. M/S. Rainbow Mercantile P. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: 3216 of 2008, present Appeal does not survive for consideration and is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY VPH ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.2423 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income-Tax-3 Appellant Mumbai Vs M/s. Rainbow Mercantile P. Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. P. S. Sahadevan, for the appellant. Mr. J. D. Mistry with Mr. A. K. Jasani, for the respondent. CORAM: Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, & V. C. DAGA, JJ. DATED: DECEMBER 10, 2008. P.C.: ---- . In view of dismissal of the Notice of Motion No. 3216 of 2008, present Appeal does not survive for consideration and is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- [ V. C. DAGA, J.] [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.