Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai v. M/S. Rainbow Mercantile P. Ltd

Mumbai v. M/S. Rainbow Mercantile P. Ltd

High Court 10 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. M/S. Rainbow Mercantile P. Ltd
Date of order
10 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. M/S. Rainbow Mercantile P. Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY VPH ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION No. 3216 OF 2008 IM INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No. 2423 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Appellant Mumbai Vs M/s. Rainbow Mercantile P. Ltd., ... Respondent Mumbai Mr. P. S. Sahadevan, for the appellant. Mr. J. D. Mistry with Mr. A. K. Jasani, for the respondent. CORAM: Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, & V. C. DAGA, JJ. DATED: DECEMBER 10, 2008. P.C.: ---- . Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. By this Notice of Motion, the appellant is seeking condonation of the delay of 1263 days in filing the above Appeal. The above Appeal is filed against the judgment and order of ITAT dated 29th October, 2003. Perused the Notice of Motion and the affidavit in support thereof. It appears that the CIT granted aproval for filing the appeal on 8th April 2004. However, it appears that the appeal came to be lodged on 15th October 2004 i.e. - 2 - after a lapse of more than three & half years. The reasons given in the affidavit, for the delay in filing the Appeal are, the getting the draft of memo of appeal prepapred and getting the Court-fee stamps. We are not at all satisfied with the reasons. No case is made out for condoning the delay. In the result, Notice of Motion is dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- [ V. C. DAGA, J.] [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan