Mumbai v. M/S Raj Traders
High Court
14 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. M/S Raj Traders
Date of order
14 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. M/S Raj Traders, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 743 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income Tax .... Appellant
Mumbai
Vs.
M/s Raj Traders .... Respondent
Mr. Ashok Kotangale for Appellant.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, &
. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ
. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ
DATE : 14TH AUGUST, 2007
P.C.
. As the tax incidence is less than Rs. 4
lakhs, the learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw
the appeal. The questions of law, if any, is kept
open for consideration in an appropriate
proceeding. Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. Refund
of court fees as per rules. Certified copy
expedited.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue