Mumbai v. M/S. Willingdon Sports Club
High Court
18 Mar 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. M/S. Willingdon Sports Club
Date of order
18 Mar 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. M/S. Willingdon Sports Club, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: For the reasons given therein, this appeal is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 122 OF 2005
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 122 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax -16
Mumbai. ... Appellant
Versus
M/s. Willingdon Sports Club,
Clark Road, Mahalaxmi,
Mumbai 400 034. ... Respondent
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.K.B. Bhujale for Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: MARCH 18, 2008
CORAM: F.I.
R.S. MOHITE, JJ.
DATED: MARCH 18, 2008
P.C.
. The issues involved in this Appeal are similar to
that were in issue in Income Tax Appeal No. 121 of
2005 which is disposed of by this court today. For
the reasons given therein, this appeal is also
dismissed.
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(R.S. MOHITE, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue