In Mumbai v. M/S.a.f.ferguson & Co, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2502 of 2005
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1064 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai ..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.A.F.Ferguson & Co. ..Respondent
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan, for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007
P.C.:
. There is a delay of 236 days. Respondents
though served have not filed reply opposing the
contents of the affidavit in support. Considering
that the delay is occasioned because of the Law
Department it would amount to sufficient cause.
Consequently delay is condoned. Motion made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to
register the Appeal.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue