Case Law › High Court › Mumbai v. M/S.asian Paints (I) Ltd

Mumbai v. M/S.asian Paints (I) Ltd

High Court 04 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Sep 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. M/S.asian Paints (I) Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1046 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Asian Paints (I) Ltd. ...Respondent Mr.B.M. Chaterji and Mrs. P.P. Bhosale for the appellant. Mr. S.S. Shetty for the respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007 DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: . As the Motion is dismissed, Appeal does not survive. Hence appeal dismissed. Refund of Court Fees as per Rules. Certified copy expedited. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.